The State of Social Media 2008
Today, Brian Solis of FutureWorks, published a report on The State of Social Media 2008. Solis comments on several key points to consider about Social Media, including:
- There's a fundamental shift a foot in content creation, distribution, and consumption that must be considered/resourced as a result of the Social Web.
- Understanding Social Media (or having "experts" who do) will help guide businesses towards visibility, profitability, relevance and ultimately customer loyalty.
- Social Media is a critical part of a larger, more complete sales, service, communications, and marketing strategy that reflects and adapts to markets and the people who define them.
- Social Media expands the communications toolkit.
- Social Media is a distribution channel.
- Social Media is a revelation that we the people have a voice and through the democratization of content and ideas, we can once again unite people around common passions, inspire movement, and ignite change.
- Social Media is a means, not an end.
Social Media Takes a Community Effort
Solis also dedicates a section of his report to the important point that Social Media Takes a Community Effort. I found this section of particular interest because we often shepherd our clients through this organizational debate - Who governs the conversation?
As Solis notes, some argue that advertising or marketing own the conversation, while others claim that it’s the job of public relations or customer service. We also see other stakeholders vying for a say, like information technology (IT) and Legal - because it's not only about the message, but how the message is going to be delivered and where?, who's going to monitor it and how?, and what level of support will be needed to manage, aggregate, mine and ultimately report on this "conversation."
Often so many logistics and an overly complex governing structure can stifle the conversation, but as we agree with Solis' point, every department can/will have a positive impact on creating and sustaining the conversation, if there is a clear and concerted effort to do so.
It has been our position that shared goals and shared responsibilities foster a healthy culture around communications, particularly in context of the Social Web. If the organization as a whole clearly embraces every aspect of their brand promise and understands the responsibility and obligation to the brand (and the customer) in the Social Media context - the natural conversation can be enriched and flow appropriately with diversity in expertise, ideas, perspectives - and even "personality."
Not to oversimplify the complexity of creating a dynamic structure around sustaining communications as conversation, but every organization has come to understand that the Web itself is a necessary business and communication channel. As it has evolved, it is no longer one dimensional, but dynamic and social. The conversation is now more democratic and de-centralized beyond an organization's own "domain." (I mean this in the sense of an org's own dot com, for example.)
Understanding the responsibility of total ownership of a conversation needs to be defined, requires diversity of thinking and response and a strategy which clearly identifies, defines and adopts a mutual understanding of the commitment to engage and participate in the "conversation" - 24x7. In a more traditional sense it may look and feel like "centralized management," but ultimately, as Solis says, it's a community effort, whereby no single department (must) own and operate the conversation, but the enterprise (in this sense - a community) collective relies upon every subject-matter expert to contribute to the benefit of the message and the livelihood of a sustained conversation.